Split rules/C1 and decisions/C1 into one rule per piece of evidence

AGENTS.md

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ The library has two layers: `nameparser/config/` (data) and `nameparser/parser.p
 
 **A constant's membership is a question you may reopen.** Proposing that a word be ADDED, REMOVED or MOVED between vocabulary sets is ordinary design work — a shipped entry is not evidence that anyone judged it. `SUFFIX_ACRONYMS` arrived in `af5bdab` as a bulk Wikipedia import never reviewed against surname collisions: 572 of its 577 alphabetic entries leave `family` empty in `"John <word>"` against five ambiguous-gated exceptions (recomputed 2026-09-07; the fifth is `ba`; 568 of 575 against seven, measured 2026-09-25 after #540), and `sa`, `se` and `om` are borne as surnames (measured 2026-08-23), as were `rai`, `cha`, `ba` and `mc` before `decisions/suffix-acronym-collisions` decided all four — `rai` and `cha` removed, `ba` marked ambiguous, `mc` left alone as no borne name at all. The same entry marked `meng` and `lac` ambiguous on 2026-09-25 (#540). When a fix starts to look like new machinery, check the vocabulary first. Criterion: `decisions/vocabulary-collisions`, with #360's positional qualifier.
 
-**Sweep the forms a change can reach: comma shapes, then `name_order`.** No comma, a FULL name before the comma, a ONE-WORD name before the comma and NOTHING before the comma are four paths, and the last two are the misses — #429, #430 and #432 are all the one-word path disagreeing with the full-name path on inputs the full-name path reads correctly, and #613's PR review found `, PhD` and `, Jr.` (an empty surname field, as CSV data writes it) read as given and title by a decision that returned early on an empty head, after two review rounds whose every grid had a name before the comma. Put an empty head and a nickname-only head (`(Bob), PhD`) in every comma grid. Count the one-word path the way C1 counts, which is neither tokens nor pieces: a particle run and the one word it attaches to are one word (#575), a connective join and a bound given-name pair count as their words (#613, so `Ortega y Gasset, Dr.` is a whole name), and a suffix beside the surname counts as no name word at all. #603's review found the suffix half (`Vega y Lopez Jr., PhD Jones` lost its family where `Vega y Lopez, PhD Jones` kept it); #613 then reversed the connective half, and both now read given 'Vega', middle 'y', family 'Lopez' — so test a particle surname, a connective surname and a surname with a suffix, each before a comma. For orders the sweep already exists (`tests/v2/test_cases.py` runs every row under all three) but carries one assertion, R2's family partition, so it checks nothing a new change moves; coverage there has been vacuous before (PR #394's review found the suite passed with `name_order` discarded from grouping). Parse your change's names in each comma shape and each order, and read the ones you did not predict. And read a generated grid's moves by SHAPE, not by corpus membership: #614's first design passed the suite, the five gates and a fingerprint of every corpus name, because its grid moves were sorted into 'corpus name moved' and 'garbage', and the review found the moves that mattered among the 'garbage' -- a bare salutation (`Mr. and Mrs.` lost its connective to the family name) and a name with one trailing word (`Freiherr von Berg X.Y.Z.`). Pull out the head-plus-one-word slice of the grid and a salutation with nothing after it, and read every move there. Two more were the second review's (#614): no grid put TWO words that are both a title and a particle at the head (`Freiherr St van Berg MA`, where an index into the pieces was applied to a merged view of them -- `TITLES ∩ particles_ambiguous` is `{freiherr, st}`, so put both in every head list, each in its bare and its period-marked spelling -- #637's grid had `St` and `Freiherr` alone and missed that `St.` and `Freiherr.` are declined by the bound join and then attached by P6), and the grids compared ambiguity KINDS, so a report telling the caller the wrong field (`Freiherr von Berg Ma`, 'read as a given name' of a word in the family) passed every pin. #701's review added one: put a title/suffix dual (`Ms`, `Sr.`, `Cpl`) SECOND in a title run, behind an ordinary title. A stop that asks only "is this word suffix vocabulary" passes every row that opens with the dual and fails `Rev. Sr. Smith, Mary`; it was found by comparing `T Smith, John` against `T John Smith` over every title word, and a comma-versus-comma-less comparison is the cheap check for any rule that moves a word between the two slots. Compare each report's `detail` against the field its tokens land in -- since #626 `test_a_report_names_the_field_its_word_lands_in` (tests/v2/test_cases.py) does it over every non-locale case row under all three orders (a row carrying its own policy only as declared), for the phrasings its `_FIELD_CLAIMS` lists -- so a row with the shape is the test only where the report's wording is listed: a new emitter's wording goes in that list, and segment's report on a part past the second comma names no field (#629). #626's own first grid then missed an emitter for want of one comma shape (`, Ma Dr.`: an empty head, an ambiguous word, a trailing title, which H1 moves to the family): a trailing title belongs in every empty-head comma grid too. And #620's: an exclusion list in code being replaced is a set of rules, not noise -- #614's merged copy excluded every word the trailing read weighs from its units, the first #620 prototype dropped the list as a symptom of the copy, and its review found the list had been keeping positional counting's rule that a member in front counts as a word (`Freiherr von Berg MA X.Y.Z.` lost its suffix). Before deleting one, mutate each entry out and read what moves.
+**Sweep the forms a change can reach: comma shapes, then `name_order`.** No comma, a FULL name before the comma, a ONE-WORD name before the comma and NOTHING before the comma are four paths, and the last two are the misses — #429, #430 and #432 are all the one-word path disagreeing with the full-name path on inputs the full-name path reads correctly, and #613's PR review found `, PhD` and `, Jr.` (an empty surname field, as CSV data writes it) read as given and title by a decision that returned early on an empty head, after two review rounds whose every grid had a name before the comma. Put an empty head and a nickname-only head (`(Bob), PhD`) in every comma grid. Count the one-word path the way C3 counts, which is neither tokens nor pieces: a particle run and the one word it attaches to are one word (#575), a connective join and a bound given-name pair count as their words (#613, so `Ortega y Gasset, Dr.` is a whole name), and a suffix beside the surname counts as no name word at all. #603's review found the suffix half (`Vega y Lopez Jr., PhD Jones` lost its family where `Vega y Lopez, PhD Jones` kept it); #613 then reversed the connective half, and both now read given 'Vega', middle 'y', family 'Lopez' — so test a particle surname, a connective surname and a surname with a suffix, each before a comma. For orders the sweep already exists (`tests/v2/test_cases.py` runs every row under all three) but carries one assertion, R2's family partition, so it checks nothing a new change moves; coverage there has been vacuous before (PR #394's review found the suite passed with `name_order` discarded from grouping). Parse your change's names in each comma shape and each order, and read the ones you did not predict. And read a generated grid's moves by SHAPE, not by corpus membership: #614's first design passed the suite, the five gates and a fingerprint of every corpus name, because its grid moves were sorted into 'corpus name moved' and 'garbage', and the review found the moves that mattered among the 'garbage' -- a bare salutation (`Mr. and Mrs.` lost its connective to the family name) and a name with one trailing word (`Freiherr von Berg X.Y.Z.`). Pull out the head-plus-one-word slice of the grid and a salutation with nothing after it, and read every move there. Two more were the second review's (#614): no grid put TWO words that are both a title and a particle at the head (`Freiherr St van Berg MA`, where an index into the pieces was applied to a merged view of them -- `TITLES ∩ particles_ambiguous` is `{freiherr, st}`, so put both in every head list, each in its bare and its period-marked spelling -- #637's grid had `St` and `Freiherr` alone and missed that `St.` and `Freiherr.` are declined by the bound join and then attached by P6), and the grids compared ambiguity KINDS, so a report telling the caller the wrong field (`Freiherr von Berg Ma`, 'read as a given name' of a word in the family) passed every pin. #701's review added one: put a title/suffix dual (`Ms`, `Sr.`, `Cpl`) SECOND in a title run, behind an ordinary title. A stop that asks only "is this word suffix vocabulary" passes every row that opens with the dual and fails `Rev. Sr. Smith, Mary`; it was found by comparing `T Smith, John` against `T John Smith` over every title word, and a comma-versus-comma-less comparison is the cheap check for any rule that moves a word between the two slots. Compare each report's `detail` against the field its tokens land in -- since #626 `test_a_report_names_the_field_its_word_lands_in` (tests/v2/test_cases.py) does it over every non-locale case row under all three orders (a row carrying its own policy only as declared), for the phrasings its `_FIELD_CLAIMS` lists -- so a row with the shape is the test only where the report's wording is listed: a new emitter's wording goes in that list, and segment's report on a part past the second comma names no field (#629). #626's own first grid then missed an emitter for want of one comma shape (`, Ma Dr.`: an empty head, an ambiguous word, a trailing title, which H1 moves to the family): a trailing title belongs in every empty-head comma grid too. And #620's: an exclusion list in code being replaced is a set of rules, not noise -- #614's merged copy excluded every word the trailing read weighs from its units, the first #620 prototype dropped the list as a symptom of the copy, and its review found the list had been keeping positional counting's rule that a member in front counts as a word (`Freiherr von Berg MA X.Y.Z.` lost its suffix). Before deleting one, mutate each entry out and read what moves.
 
 **Then sweep the spellings: a class reached by vocabulary is also reached by SHAPE.** A test that uses only the listed spelling of a word class walks only the vocabulary path, and the shape path is a separate branch that can be missing while every test passes. Roman numerals are the sharpest case: `ii`, `iii` and `iv` are suffix vocabulary; `i` and `v` are vocabulary too but initial-shaped, so `is_suffix_piece` vetoes them and only the numeral fork reads them; and `vi` through `x` are in no list at all, read by the fork's shape test alone (checked 2026-10-04 against `Lexicon.default()`) -- which stops at `x`: `_vocab._ROMAN` matches I to X, so `John Smith XI` reads `XI` as a name word (re-checked 2026-10-07, #614's /simplify, which found a docstring claiming "any length"). And the fork counts a ONE-letter numeral besides, since #718 (rules/S10): it is the suffix only where the name has a word to spare, so `John V` and `John Smith V` take different branches of one fork, a one-case name being counted like capitals whatever the letter -- since #721 a one-case one-letter numeral carries the `initial` tag its capital does, and since #723 every one-case bare letter does (rules/T4), and a bare letter in front of the numeral is initial-shaped as its capital is, so `john v` reads as `JOHN V` does over `test_a_one_case_name_reads_as_its_capitals`'s grid (comma shapes, orders, a maiden clause, a particle chain, a bare letter in front, a trailing title, a non-ASCII letter in front: 315 of its then 1,872 pairs disagreed at 2bfa9533, before #721, and none after). Its first version claimed "every shape" with no bare letter in front and no trailing title in the grid, and #721's reviews found both broken; a grid's claim is the grid -- put a head-plus-numeral row beside every words-to-spare row. So a change that handles `V` and `III` can still miss `VI` — #610 found exactly that, the maiden take's candidate loop admitting a shape-only numeral in one position where the peel reads it in two (`Jane Doe nee Smith VI Prof.` kept maiden `Smith VI` while `V` and `III` worked). The same split runs through the credentials (`MA` listed, `X.Y.Z.` by the dotted shape, `XYZ` by the caps shape, and `Ph. D.` merged by group into one flagged piece the peel's walk never holds -- #603 found #602's run-start predicate refusing it too, so `Smith, John Ph. D. Jones` kept middle 'Jones' where `Smith, John PhD Jones` read suffix 'PhD Jones') and the titles (`Prof.` period-marked and read at the end of a name, `Prof` bare and a name word there). When a change touches a word class, test one spelling from each path. The same holds for a separator's SPACING: a comma (or any punctuation) can stand alone, glue to the word before it or glue to the word after, and each is a different token stream. #653's first fix swept `(née, Jones)` and missed `(née , Jones)`, where the kept comma became a word after the marker and M3 read the clause as maiden ', Jones'; its review found it. Put all three spacings in any grid around a separator.
 

docs/design/AGENTS.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ rules/ states intended parsing behavior and is NORMATIVE; decisions/ is the date
 
 **Landing a design.** The gitignored spec (docs/superpowers/specs/) is the working medium; it dies with the branch, and the docs are the record. Before a design PR merges, walk its spec (including amendments) and distill the durable residue: decisions made or reversed → decisions entries; proposals rejected with evidence → Declined:; vocabulary that must stay out → Excluded:; behavior the design settled → rules/ (with a deviates: marker if unshipped); reusable patterns → mechanisms.md; options weighed → a weighing entry. Then check the spec cites nothing the docs don't now carry — a spec section with no committed home when the PR merges is lost, not deferred (a 2026-08-16 sweep of eight weeks of specs recovered nine such items). The same-PR amendment rule above covers code-driven changes; this covers the design-driven ones.
 
-**Moving text between files breaks every positional reference in it, and in what pointed at it.** "The bullet above", "this file's Excluded block", "the W2 section" are true only where the text stood. #713 split decisions.md by heading and then moved the vocabulary-keyed blocks into decisions/vocabulary-exclusions, and its last review found thirteen such references left pointing at nothing: three inside the moved blocks, ten in entries elsewhere that located a block by position. The citation check cannot see them, because none is a citation. After a move, grep the moved text and the whole folder for `above`, `below`, `this file`, `this section` and the moved block's name, and turn each hit into a key-form pointer (`decisions/P3's bullet of that date`). Splitting an ID is the same move in the other direction (#682, S2 into S2 and S4–S9): every reference to the old ID needs a reader's choice of new one, and the references come in more spellings than the citation check reads — `rules/S2` and `decisions/S2`, a bare `S2` in rule prose, and the short forms older entries use, `#S2` and "the #544 entry under S2". #682's first pass retargeted the first three and its review found nine of the last kind still pointing at entries that had left the file; grep all five before calling the retarget done.
+**Moving text between files breaks every positional reference in it, and in what pointed at it.** "The bullet above", "this file's Excluded block", "the W2 section" are true only where the text stood. #713 split decisions.md by heading and then moved the vocabulary-keyed blocks into decisions/vocabulary-exclusions, and its last review found thirteen such references left pointing at nothing: three inside the moved blocks, ten in entries elsewhere that located a block by position. The citation check cannot see them, because none is a citation. After a move, grep the moved text and the whole folder for `above`, `below`, `this file`, `this section` and the moved block's name, and turn each hit into a key-form pointer (`decisions/P3's bullet of that date`). Splitting an ID is the same move in the other direction (#682, S2 into S2 and S4–S9): every reference to the old ID needs a reader's choice of new one, and the references come in more spellings than the citation check reads — `rules/S2` and `decisions/S2`, a bare `S2` in rule prose, and the short forms older entries use, `#S2` and "the #544 entry under S2". #682's first pass retargeted the first three and its review found nine of the last kind still pointing at entries that had left the file; grep all five before calling the retarget done. #728 (C1 into C1 and C3–C11) added two more. A blanket note that an old ID in a moved entry "means the rule as it then stood" is true only where the pointer meant the whole rule: "C1's two-dotted-groups sentence" means C5 now, so retarget each pointer that names a piece. And the prose a split writes fresh is new normative text that no guard reads against its statement. That covers each piece's Rationale, and a `· boundary` added so a piece has one. #728's first C4 Rationale called two words before the comma "a whole name", which C5's exception denies. Its first C10 boundary carried no policy annotation, so the rule never ran on it. Read each new Rationale against its piece's exceptions, and run each new boundary under the annotation its rule needs.
 
 **A count in a dated entry is evidence, not a live fact.** decisions entries are snapshots by convention, so measurements belong in them — but a reader wanting TODAY's number must not have to trust the snapshot's date. Where an entry quotes something that drifts (vocabulary sizes, corpus counts, set compositions), give the one-liner that recomputes it, and phrase the argument so it survives the digits moving — "the two shares differ by orders of magnitude" outlives "58% vs 0.65%". A count that carries no argument is better deleted than dated: "over every name in the corpus, no prefilter" says what "over all 782 names" says, and cannot go stale. Do NOT reach for a test asserting the count — that is the constant-content pattern, and it fails on every legitimate vocabulary addition. #326 is the cautionary case: it quoted a vocabulary composition, carried a date, and was stale in five days.