Repository navigation
Show a real implementation for typing.overload - #159611
Open
shenanigansd wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
shenanigansd wants to merge 1 commit into
shenanigansd wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The typing.overload example ended with a placeholder implementation, so it looked like the overload stubs even though the text says the final undecorated definition is the one that runs. Replace it with a short working implementation. Signed-off-by: Bradley Reynolds <bradley.reynolds@tailstory.dev>
shenanigansd
requested review from
AlexWaygood and
JelleZijlstra
as code owners
October 17, 2026 01:52
bedevere-app
Bot
added
awaiting review
docs
Documentation build overview
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The typing.overload example ended with a placeholder implementation, so it looked like the overload stubs even though the text says the final undecorated definition is the one that runs. Replace it with a short working implementation.
I skipped the issue and the news for this trivial docs change, hope that's okay.