PEP 609: Mark as superseded by PEP 772

[hugovk]

PEP 772 ("Packaging Council governance process") is already marked as "Replaces: 609" ("Python Packaging Authority (PyPA) Governance").

772 is already accepted, the first Packaging Council election concluded yesterday, so this PR applies the matching change for 609.

cc 772 authors: @warsaw @eximious @pradyunsg

cc new council: @brettcannon @dstufft @henryiii @pradyunsg @rgommers

Draft for now, in case the authors/council want to do something about the PyPA stuff in 609 first.

[read-the-docs-community]

Documentation build overview

📚 pep-previews | 🛠️ Build #34590784 | 📁 Comparing 313df9c against latest (94a7775)

  🔍 Preview build  

6 files changed · ± 6 modified

± Modified

• index.html
• numerical/index.html
• pep-0000/index.html
• pep-0609/index.html
• topic/governance/index.html
• topic/packaging/index.html

[brettcannon]

PEP 772 might actually be wrong in replacing PEP 609 as the latter is the PyPA while former while the latter is not specifically about the PyPA (e.g., PEP 772 talks about working with the PyPA, not taking it over).

[hugovk]

Yep, in the short term we could instead delete "Replaces: 609" from PEP 772, and then any PyPA changes can be considered independently and in their own time?

[warsaw]

PEP 772 might actually be wrong in replacing PEP 609 as the latter is the PyPA while former while the latter is not specifically about the PyPA (e.g., PEP 772 talks about working with the PyPA, not taking it over).

Agreed

Yep, in the short term we could instead delete "Replaces: 609" from PEP 772, and then any PyPA changes can be considered independently and in their own time?

Agreed. Let's let the PPC decide.

[hugovk]

#5166 has been merged to remove "Replaces: 609" from PEP 772.

Let's close this one?

cc @pradyunsg

[brettcannon]

@hugovk Yep, this PEP isn't the way we want to go.